AMD EPYC “Torino” con 192 Core e 384 I thread offrono quasi 40% Prestazioni superiori rispetto a Intel Xeon 6
These gains come with improved efficiency. While power consumption increased moderately, performance improvements resulted in better overall efficiency. Per esempio, the EPYC 9965 Usato 32% more power than the EPYC 9654 but delivered 1.55x the performance. Power consumption remains competitive: the EPYC 9965 averaged 275 Watt (peak 461 Watt), the EPYC 9755 averaged 324 Watt (peak 500 Watt), while Intel’s Xeon 6980P averaged 322 Watt (peak 547 Watt). AMD’s pricing strategy adds to the appeal. The 192-core model is priced at $14,813, compared to Intel’s 128-core CPU at $17,800. This competitive pricing, combined with superior performance per dollar and watt, has resonated with hyperscalers. Estimates suggest 50-60% of hyperscale deployments now use AMD processors.
The Blue Empire is ready to strike back at AMD, with its upcoming “Foresta della Sierra” CPUs with up to 288 E-colori. Intel must deliver similar or greater performance metrics with its new E-core Xeon processor, keeping power consumption low and costs reasonable, so we expect to see a heated battle in the server space between Intel and AMD. Besides more cores, “Foresta della Sierra” will bring 12-channel DDR5 memory, so the massive core count will get adequate memory bandwidth. Fino ad allora, AMD has the crown of performance, efficienza, and value, and we are curious to see this driving competition and further innovation from both sides.